Few days ago this story made the LA Times about dozens of law school grads across the country suing their schools on the basis of misrepresentations the schools made to them relating to employment success after graduation. Apparently, the Bar requires schools to post their employment stats, and they did, one CA school in particular, boasted a 97% employment rate 9 mos after graduation. But as some grads discovered too late, "employment" by definition can mean part-time barrista at Starbucks.
Not sure I agree with their methodology, but I guess there's a lesson in this to all of us, caveat emptor, and if it's too good to be true, it's probably not. Interesting story, check it out
LA Times
Not sure I agree with their methodology, but I guess there's a lesson in this to all of us, caveat emptor, and if it's too good to be true, it's probably not. Interesting story, check it out
LA Times